<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems">
<title>Comments  on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</link>
<description>Comments  on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</description>
<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>rss@thegovernmentsays.com</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>rss@thegovernmentsays.com</dc:creator>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_6408" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14947#comment_1401" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15103#comment_1162" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15086#comment_1161" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_1160" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14957#comment_1153" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14979#comment_1138" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15024#comment_1137" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_6408">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_6408</link>
<description>In areas where there has always been three main party MP&#x27;s, the elector feels it is not worth voting because they &#x22;always get in&#x22;    </description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14947#comment_1401">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14947#comment_1401</link>
<description>Interesting that Jack Straw takes ownership of this document, but it is Michael Wills, his no:2, who has been fronting the defence in the Commons.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15103#comment_1162">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15103#comment_1162</link>
<description>Is there any evidence to support the assumption that voters feel an affinity for their representative under FPTP? &#x3C;br /&#x3E;&#x3C;br /&#x3E;My own view is that a great many voters have little or no awareness of the name, personality or opinions of candidates or their eventually elected representatives. Rather, they vote for a party, and are primarily influenced by the personalities of the party leaders and the second-hand opinions regarding policies that they absorb from the Media. This is particularly true for General Elections.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15086#comment_1161">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15086#comment_1161</link>
<description>..and this is surely an unwelcome distortion of the electoral system</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_1160">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15085#comment_1160</link>
<description>In my opinion this is the main disadvantage of FPTP, and it&#x27;s decisive. FPTP effectively disenfranchises voters who favour minority candidates or parties.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14957#comment_1153">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14957#comment_1153</link>
<description>No, it doesn&#x27;t repeat itself in the PDF.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14979#comment_1138">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/14979#comment_1138</link>
<description>stv appears to be the fairest method of election, certainly much fairer than ist past the post.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15024#comment_1137">
<title>Comment on http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems</title>
<link>http://www.commentonthis.com/votingsystems/comments/15024#comment_1137</link>
<description>Yet another broken promise by Labour.  Under Blair, the Government were more concerned with grabbing power than sharing it.  Will Brown be any different?</description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
